The day after USC’s football (and basketball) program faced some of the NCAA’s most severe punishment, short of the death penalty—following a four year probe into improper benefits for 2004 Heisman Trophy winner Reggie Bush and former "once and done" basketball player O.J. Mayo—Matt Billings, USC’s Director of Compliance, claims that five universities have improperly contacted Freshmen RB Dillon Baxter to gauge his interest in transferring in light of USC’s probation.
If true, which at least two institutions, Florida and Oregon, have already denied, five more schools—Alabama, Fresno State, Washington, as well as the afore mentioned Florida, and Oregon—could be facing some NCAA questioning of their own.
Since Baxter is already enrolled at USC as a full-time student he could only transfer if he is willing to sit out a year.
Moreover, any contact with other institutions MUST be initiated by the student (NCAA rule 14.5.2).
Upperclassmen—juniors and seniors—may be contacted by other schools according to an email from NCAA spokeswomen Stacey Osburn sent to ESPN’s Joe Schad.
However, the new school would have to request a waiver to the ‘"year in residence" clause but the NCAA rules allow for the waiver if a student-athlete's first school has a postseason ban in their sport.
The "fly in the ointment" is that the Pac-10 does not intend to allow the waiver if the athlete is transferring to another Pac 10 school according to ESPNLosAngeles.com.
The offending institutions could play dumb and say they thought the waiver could be applied to all USC athletes, but that would be about as believable as Lane Kiffin claiming that he didn’t initiate any contact with Tennessee players or recruits when he was employed by USC, and on his way off of the riotous Knoxville campus back in January.
So, is this poetic justice or just another case (or five) of thuggery and skull-duggery in college football?
With the pillaging of the Big XII and other conferences under way, the back stabbing and rivalry busting that is inevitable in the superconference debate and USC’s beat down by the NCAA; these accusations may be flying under the radar.
Nonetheless, if true the NCAA needs to make an example of these schools.
The severity of the actions and penalties may not compare to USC’s crimes but they too should face appropriate sanctions.
If they are not true then Baxter, or whoever put him up to the false report, should face further sanctions.
Someone is lying, let’s just hope it doesn’t take the boys at the (NCAA) home office in Indianapolis another four years to get to the bottom of it!
Sources:
ESPNLosAngeles.com's Mark Saxon, ESPN's Joe Schad, Bleacher Report’s Lisa Horne.
USC Running Back Dillon Baxter Claims Illegal Contact By Schools
June 12th, 2010Well, that certainly didn't take long.
Only a day after the NCAA lowered the boom on USC, the vultures are attempting to circle the carcass.
ESPN's Joe Schad is reporting that USC mega-recruit, running back Dillon Baxter, has notified the Trojans' compliance office that five schools have illegally contacted him, apparently attempting to woo him to their programs.
Alabama, Florida, Fresno State, Oregon, and Washington are the teams identified as making overtures to Baxter, the 2009 five-star (as rated by Scout.com) quarterback/running back who set a California state record by scoring an eye-popping 79 touchdowns, including 50 on the ground.
Baxter, whose spring practice with the Trojans routinely featured spectacular runs that were celebrated far and wide on "Youtube," is generally considered a "can't miss" prospect by most who see him, so it's not surprising that he would be coveted by other programs.
What is surprising, or perhaps I am gullible, is that so many programs who should know better took a shot at contacting a student-athlete whom they had no chance of getting.
Before I go any further, it should be noted that this is a preliminary report and when everything comes out, perhaps this contact was not illegal at all.
If so, then the question becomes one of decorum.
Is there a "waiting period" before another college football program attempts to steal from a weakened foe?
Can one call Dear Abby to see if any college gridiron etiquette has been violated?
For the five programs identified by Baxter, apparently that grace period lasted all of 24 hours.
If that.
In a sad commentary on the state of college athletic ethics, USC hadn't even yet picked itself off the floor after the NCAA hay-maker before opposing programs began to swoop in hoping to pick clean the Trojans of a high profile prospect.
To Dillon Baxter's credit, it appears that he wasn't having any of that, and by reporting these programs to his compliance office, Baxter said in no uncertain terms that he plans on remaining a Trojan.
Take that you blood suckers.
Before any other programs start looking to speed dial Seantrel Henderson, Robert Woods, or any of the other highly regarded incoming USC freshmen trying to sweet talk them into a back door transfer, they may want to revisit what happened with Dillon Baxter.
It may save them the embarrassment of what at worst could be illegal contact and at best an emphatic "no" from the player in question.
Where this goes from here is anyone's guess but it seems as though there is a bit of karma at play here, especially if this contact was indeed illegal.
And while it won't soothe the open wounds of a reeling USC football program, maybe it will give them something else to think about for awhile.
Lord knows they could use that right about now.
Comments Off »
Posted in College Football, College Gameday, Opinion, Pac-10 Football, USC Football
Tags: Abby Alabama California college college football program compliance compliance office contact dear abby Dillon Dillon Baxter espn Florida Fresno fresno state Henderson Joe Schad NCAA office Oregon prospect question Robert Woods s joe sad commentary Scout spring practice State student athlete Trojans USC Washington